Call/WhatsApp/Text: 0716214439
Email Us: ordersclassytutors@gmail.com

The benefits and disadvantages of Psychiatric Evaluation and Evidence-Based Rating Scales | 2022

Sep 30, 2022

The Psychiatric Evaluation and Evidence-Based Rating Scales are discussed.

Paper Specifications:
Assessment tools serve two basic functions: 1) measuring sickness and diagnosing clients, and 2) measuring a client's reaction to treatment. Multiple assessment instruments are frequently designed to measure the same condition or reaction. However, not all instruments are acceptable for use in all clinical settings.
To choose the best evaluation tool for your client, you must analyze the benefits and disadvantages of each tool. Consider the use of the evaluation tool supplied to you by the Course Instructor in psychotherapy as you analyze it for this Discussion.


Overview

The psychiatric interview, according to Saddock, Saddock, and Ruiz (2015), is the most crucial component in the evaluation and care of people with mental illnesses. It is the method by which we gather information that will inform the criteria-based diagnosis and, eventually, the plan of care.

The interview will establish the client-provider relationship from the start, which can have a significant impact on the result of therapy. Past psychiatric disease, a mental status test, and formulation NRNP 6635 are three crucial components of the psychiatric interview. Discussion of Psychiatric Evaluation and Evidence-Based Rating Scales

The patient's historical mental history should cover all psychiatric disorders, symptoms, and treatment throughout his or her life. When the symptoms occurred, how long they lasted, and the frequency and intensity of bouts should all be documented. Saddock and Saddock (2015) NRNP 6635 Discussion of Psychiatric Evaluation and Evidence-Based Rating Scales Suicidal or homicidal ideations, as well as bouts of self-injury, should be assessed as special considerations. Outpatient, inpatient, day, and voluntary/involuntary treatment should all be included in treatment episodes.

The practitioner should gather and examine information about medication use, other modalities employed, such as electroconvulsive treatment (ECT), and the patient's response. Did the patient experience any side effects or any undesirable impacts as a result of the treatment? Finally, in prior episodes, a diagnosis was reached that should be considered now.

Boost your grades with our academic help